Stuart-NDLCP.p1 Stuart-NDLCP.p1 Stuart-NDLCP.p1 TOK.p18.r3.c3
CRN Panel 6 G5 CRN Panel 6 K1 CRN Panel 6 T1
YATIK? YATIK? YATIK? ?
Martin-WaD.p1.fig1 (Schele) Martin-WaD.p1.fig1 (Schele) Martin-WaD.p1.fig1 (Schele)
CRN “Dallas Panel” G5 CRN “Dallas Panel” K1 CRN “Dallas Panel” T1
YATIK? YATIK? YATIK?
Martin-WaD.p4.fig4a (Martin) Martin-WaD.p4.fig4b (Leaman) = FK.p8.HumanHeads.r2.c5 Martin-WaD.p4.fig4 (Martin)
CRN “Dallas Altar” G5 CRN “Dallas Altar” K1a CRN “Dallas Altar” T1a
YATIK? YATIK? YATIK? YATIK?
Boot-CaACD.p4.fig3 = Boot-AtCoINYKM.p19.fig12.e TOK.p18.r3.c4 T831 MHD.ZTA.1&2
Early Classic ceramic vessel F-G
5.YATIK? KOKAAJ ? - ATIK
· Martin-WaD is the paper in which Martin argues for the meaning “daughter of (father)”.
· The readings of YATIK in Martin-WaD are not based on the Linda Schele drawing (given in Martin-WaD.p1.fig1), but instead on his own re-drawings (given in p4.fig4a-c), which show the “tadpoles” much more clearly in the CRN “Dallas Altar” G5, K1a, and T1a.
· TOK does not commit to a pronunciation, but gives only “?”.
· MHD gives ATIK instead of YATIK.
· Variants (3):
o A. Human head with “tadpoles” swimming around it:
§ Typically on three of the four sides but they can be around all four sides as well.
o B. The human head can be replaced by an element which resembles a le:
§ With the “tadpoles” around it, it is T831 and TOK.p18.r3.c4.
o C. MHD.ZTA.2 is a very different looking variant, where the “tadpoles” have become wavy lines.