K&H.p87.#6 K&L.p26.#7 TOK.p14.r2.c2 BMM9.p13.r1.c3 25EMC.pdfp50.#11.1&2&3 JM.p271#2
WINIK WINIK WINIK WINIK WINIK/WINAK wi.<WINIK:ki>
K&L.p63.#3 IC.p16.pdfp20.#2.1&2
WINIK / WINAL WINAL / WINAAK
K&H.p55.#4.1 TOK.p28.r5.c1 BMM9.p18.r3.c2 25EMC.pdfp51.#1.2&3
WINIK WINIK /e WINIK WINIK / WINAL
K&L.p63.#4.1-11 IC.p16.pdfp20.#2.3&4 Montgomery = Coll-1
YAX HS2 Step 7 N2
WINIK / WINAL WINAL / WINAAK 6.<WINIK:ki>
K&L.p63.#4.12 IC.p16.pdfp20.#2.5 [IC.p16.pdfp20.#2.6 = K&L.p63.#4.12]
YAX Lintel 48 D1-D2 PAL PT A9-B10
WINIK / WINAL WINAL / WINAAK
TOK.p27.r2.c2
WINIK
· 25EMC seems to make a distinction of WINIK / WINAK when it means “man, person, human” and WINIK / WINAL when it means a period of 20 days = the Maya “month”.
· Note that winal is with a short-a.
o K&L (which does explicitly indicate length) has winal.
o The spelling winaal with long-a does exist: a Google search on “winaal” “Maya” gives under 200 hits, but this seems to be the spelling in some of the modern Mayan languages.
o In Classic Maya, it’s winal: a Google search on “winal” “Maya” gives more than 75,000 hits.
· Do not confuse this with the phonetically similar wi’naal = “hunger”, “famine”.
· Variants (4):
o A. Abstract: as in “man” / “person” / “human being“ – resembling a human face (but perhaps not iconographically related?).
o B. Head:
§ Distinguishing characteristic: the head of an iguana / frog / turtle.
o C. Full figure:
§ Iguana / frog / turtle.
§ So far, only PAL PT and YAX Lintel 48.
o D. “SHIELD”. <K’UH+“turtle head?”>: This variant is given in TOK.p27.r2.c2 and is a very unusual / aberrant form.
· Do not confuse this with the visually similar boulder variant of HUUN, which has a triangular element with left and right sides slightly curved inwards, tip pointing upwards, at the centre of the bottom, whereas this has a “YAX-outline”). Note that K&L have quite a number of examples (K&L.p63.#3.1&2&4&7) which have this more “HUUN-like” element, but nevertheless listed as WINIK.