K&L.p23.#2.1&2 = 25EMC.pdfp51.4&3 TOK.p13.r2.c2 BMM9.p21.r5.c1 25EMC.pdfp51.#3.1&2
WI’ WI’ WI’ WI’
Schele Teufel-PhD.p549 Graham Stuart
PAL TI WT T1 PNG Throne 1 K’2 YAX Lintel 52 A2 CRN Panel 1 U5
<u:WI’>.<K’AL:<TUUN.ni>> WI’.<5:TUUN:ni> <WI’.<5:TUUN)>>:li WI’.<5:TUUN:ni>
· No glyphs given in K&H, BMM9.
· EB.p201.pdfp206.#2: wi’il 2 adj. “last” » WI’ > wi’[il] “last”
· K&L.p23.#2, 25EMC.pdfp551.#3 also give that WI’ is used (with underspelling / as a rebus) to write wi’il = “last”
· Features:
o Top: Boulder with:
§ Partitive disk or protected feeler or circle with crescent-pointing up in bottom right.
§ One or two cross-hatched circles to the left ç this is what makes it similar to AK’/AK’OT “dance” [although commonly cross-hatched, this is not essential, as YAX Lintel 52 A2 and CRN Panel 1 U5 have no cross-hatching]
o Bottom: an element which resembles a wa but is just an element in the logogram and is not pronounced
· Do not confuse this with the visually similar AK’/AK’OT: “dance”: AK’/AK’OT has two or three (typically cross-hatched) small circles attached to the washer in bottom right or middle of the right side, whereas in WI’ there is only a single cross-hatched area. (K&L.p23.#2.2 is an exception to this, with two cross-hatched elements).
· Do not confuse this with the visually similar IHK’: “black”: IHK’ has the washer and the cross-hatched elements stacked vertically, whereas in WI’ they are either at an angle (NW from the bottom right corner) or (almost) horizontal.