K&L.p41.#5.2 = JM.p268.#1 TOK.p24.r3.c2 BMM9.p14.r3.c2
WE’ WE’ WE’ WE’
TOK.p21.r2.c4 = BMM9.p17.r1.c3 TOK.p24.r3.c3
WE’ WE’ WE’
TOK.p33.r1.c1 = BMM9.p21.r4.c4 K&L.p41.#5.1 = JM.p267.#4
WE’ WE’ WE’
· No glyphs given in K&H (except for a whole series of nouns derived from verbs – ceramic forms).
· Kaufman-APMED.p1195.pdfp1195 has many cognates with meanings related to “to eat” / “comer”.
· Variants (2):
o A. Human head with WAJ (maize-based food) in the mouth.
§ In TOK.p24.r3.c3, it is not WAJ but a human (WINIK) in the mouth, but in this case, it doesn’t represent a human being.
§ This is in contrast to a similar-looking element in KOJ/KOOJ/CHOJ, where the WINIK does represent a human being.
o B. Small (3-component) TI’ above WAJ (maize-based food).
· The iconographic origin of this logogram is pretty obvious: a human head with a tamale in its mouth. In the more abstract variant, it’s just the juxtaposition of “mouth” and “tamale”.