Stuart = Montgomery Teufel-PhD.p374
JM.p213.#1 JM.p213.#2 CAY Altar 4 PNG Stela 8 Y13 PNG Stela 8 Y13 PNG Stela 12 #23
<sa.ja>:la <sa[ja]>:la sa.<ja[la]> u.<sa:ja:la> u.<sa:ja{l}> sa[ja[la]]
YAX Lintel 3 F4 YAX Lintel 8 D3 YAX Lintel 13 D3 YAX Lintel 14 F3 YAX Lintel 14 G4b YAX Lintel 16 B3
sa.<ja:la> <sa:la>:ja IX.<<sa:ja>:la> IX.sa.ja{l} <sa[ja]>:la u:<sa[ja]>:la
AT-E1168-lecture6.t0:07:30(.10)
sa.ja{l}
· Often glossed as “provincial governor”, these were the chief lieutenants of the ruler of a polity, on the military (as opposed to the civil/administrative) side. They were the main leaders in a war, and are often shown with the warriors they capture. The LTI Kimbell Panel shows the handing over to the ruler of YAX of a group of three captives, captured by one of the ruler’s sajals.
· Nelson-PhD.p22-23.pdfp38-39: Sajal and ajaw were not rigid titles. An individual could assume both titles, probably depending on circumstance, social position, social status, and a host of unknown variables.
· Sim: The K’uhul Ajaw obviously only appointed someone as one of his sajals if he trusted him to a huge degree. Such a “provincial governor” would not necessarily have to be a member of the royal house of the polity itself. There’s no reason why the nobility of some of the ruling polity’s smaller vassal cities / polities might not be appointed as a sajal (it might even make sense to appoint that person to be the sajal of the city or polity he comes from and is a noble in). Most of the sajals are not named with the ajaw title, but (as explained), there is no reason why they might not be. YAX Lintel 8 F1-F4 is exactly such an instance, where AJ.<[a]tza> <K'IN:ni>.<MO':AJAW> è Aj Atz K'in Mo' Ajaw = “Aj Atz, Lord of K'in Mo'” is a 3.WINIKHAAB sa.<ja:la> è uhx winikhaab sajal = “3-K’atun Sajal”.