K&L.p34.#1 TOK.p11.r4.c2 BMM9.p12.r5.c2 JM.p206.#2
PET PET PET PET
Grube-WwH.p171.pdfp7.fig5.b
PET
· No glyphs given in K&H.
· Variants (2):
o A. Simple:
§ A “washer”.
§ The inner (small) circle of the washer can (optionally) be bold.
§ The outer (large) circle of the washer can (optionally) be bold.
o B. Animate:
§ The “simple” variant, with a “monster head” below (is this the Waterlily Serpent?).
§ Grube-WwH.p170-171.pdfp6-7 explains that the features of “regular” glyphs can be combined with a “deity head” to produce an “animated” equivalent (a “head variant).
· It lists HAAB, PET, WITZ, and K’AHK’ as being capable of having such an “animated” variant (which I think of as a “monster head”, though Grube-WwH.p170-171.pdfp6-7 does not describe is as such).
· This limited set seems to contrast with a much larger set, where the animation is achieved by combining the features of the “regular” glyph with a much more conventional “anthropomorphic head”. But the article doesn’t explicitly stress this and only implies it by listing these four examples.