TOK.p17.r2.c1 MHD.ZRJ.1&2 M&L.ZUQ
? - -
0576st = Prager-TS576.p2.pdfp2.fig2 = 0576st T576
? KUK -

Prager-TS576.p6.pdfp6.fig6.1 Prager-TS576.p6.pdfp6.fig6.2 Prager-TS576.p6.pdfp6.fig6.3 Prager-TS576.p6pdfp6..fig6.4
PAL Temple 19 Platform Y1 PAL Temple 19 Alfarda PAL Temple 19 Stone Panel AML Stela 2
<yo:ko>.<2KUK:TAL?> <yo:ko>.<KUK:TAL?> yo.<ko:KUK:TAL?> ?.<KUK:?>
![]()
T577 0577st MHD.ZRJ.3
- POM -
· Epigraphers differ on both the reading and the meaning of this glyph – there might even be two different glyphs/logograms involved:
o Thompson – recognized two different glyphs based on a spiral (anticlockwise going inwards):
§ T576:
· The spiral itself is bold.
· The area internal to the glyph which are not the spiral itself has cross-hatching/darkening.
§ T677:
· The spiral itself is a thick black line.
· The area internal to the glyph which are not the spiral itself has no cross-hatching/darkening.
o MHD (2025-07-02):
§ MHD assigns the 3-character code ZRJ and shows three examples. Some examples have internal darkening while others do not.
§ MHD gave ZRJ the reading WOL (earlier version) but that has since been removed and the glyph is now no longer given a reading.
§ MHD gives ZRJ a tentative meaning of “rubber ball?”, the tentative nature indicated by the question mark.
§ MHD explicitly matches ZRJ to T576, but leaves the equivalence to T577 open.
· On the one hand, it’s not explicitly matched in the MHD Concordance.
· But on the other hand, ZRJ.3 is a thick black spiral, with no internal darkening.
o Bonn (2025-07-02):
§ Bonn keeps T576 and T577 separate, as 0576st and 0577st.
§ Bonn gives no reading to 0576st and a reading of POM to 0577st.
§ Bonn currently has no published meanings assigned to logograms.
· Prager-TS576 is the paper where the reading KUK is first proposed:
o Because some occurrences of na after T576 were viewed as an end phonetic complement, an earlier proposed reading was BALAN.
o Prager-TS576 lays emphasis on the occurrences of ki after T576 (which – viewed as an end phonetic complement – support the KUK reading) and proposes that the na is not an end phonetic complement but an inchoative suffix è kukaan.
o There is some uncertainty whether the TAL- and CH’AJAN-like elements below T576 are part of the logogram, or whether they’re additional glyphs, to be read separately.
o Whether or not they’re read separately, Prager-TS576 proposes KUK as a reading for T576.
· Sim: As pointed out in Prager-TS576.p3.pdfp3.para2-3&fig3, it’s known that logograms with the same initial and final consonant (e.g., K’AHK’, K’UK’, and TZUTZ) are sometimes written with a (superfluous) doubler at the top left of the logogram. PAL Temple 19 Platform Y1 and PAL Temple 19 Stone Panel are two examples of such a doubler, written at the top left of 0576st.
· Although Bonn currently doesn’t have meanings associated with their codes, Prager-TS576.fig1 assigns the meaning “ball” to 0576st. Prager-TS576.fig1 assigns the reading POM and the meaning “incense” to 0577st, further underlining the distinction between T576 and T577.