K&L.p65.G2.1 = MC.p50.G2.1 K&H.p51.TabVIII.2 TMHW1960.pdfp432.r2.c1
Gronemeyer-GGF.p5.pdfp5.fig3.a Gronemeyer-GGF.p5.pdfp5.fig3.c Gronemeyer-GGF.p5.pdfp5.fig3.b
DPL Stela 16 A4 PAL Temple XVII B4 PAL PT M17
Glyph-G Glyph-F[Glyph-G] Glyph-F[Glyph-G]
Gronemeyer-GGF.p5.pdfp5.fig3.d Martin-AMP.p255.fig62
”St Louis Panel” B4 TNA Unprovenanced Column (a.k.a. BPK-LAC Unprovenanced Column) B4
Glyph-G Glyph-G
K&L.p65.G2.2 = MC.p50.G2.2 = Gronemeyer-GGF.p5.pdfp5.fig3.f
XLM P. 2 A9a
K&L.p65.G2.3 = Gronemeyer-GGF.p5.pdfp5.fig3.e (Mathews) Montgomery TMHW1960.pdfp432.r2.c2
TNA Monument 30 A2 CAY – DO Panel 1 A6
TMHW1960.pdfp432.r2.c3
· Distinguishing characteristic: HUL on the left with varying main sign on the right (but this HUL is shared with Glyph-G3, also on the left):
o The HUL is an “old variant”.
o Outside: oval outline composed of many touching dots on 3 sides (top, left, and bottom)
o Inside has variation:
§ Typically based on two stacked non-touching circles, or
§ Two slightly curved horizontal bands, or
§ “AK’AB” – rotated 90 degrees anticlockwise.
· Variants (4) of the main sign:
o A. Stylized face – this is given as one of the variants of TI’: the stylized face variant – features:
§ Top:
· Left and right feeler, each with protector
· Can (but doesn’t have to) be omitted when infixed in Glyph-F
§ Bottom: a vertically elongated boulder, divided into a top and bottom part by a slightly curved horizontal arc (pointing down); the top smaller than bottom:
· Top: 2-3 dots
o If 2: touching, can appear as a single small circle divided into two parts, with bold outline or bold divider.
o If 3: in a triangular formation, triangle pointing up (one case of 3 in a row, touching: K&H.p51.TabVIII.2).
· Bottom: resembles the lower part of HAAB.
o SIBIK-like: asymmetric, 1 example only (K&L.p65.G2.2 = MC.p50.G2.2 = Gronemeyer-GGF.p5.pdfp5.fig3.f).
This stylized face is a rare variant of TI’ (see TI’, specifically, examples TOK.p32.r5.c3 and BMM9.p21.r2.c3).
o B. “SIBIK”-like – this one is particularly easy to confuse with Glyph-G4, but here the distinguishing characteristic is the “old variant” of HUL (which is not present in Glyph-G4, which has a “7” instead).
o C. mo-NAL – features:
§ Top: NAL.
§ Bottom: “mo” – a circle of tiny touching dots with a dot in the centre.
§ Do not confuse this variant with the abstract variant of Glyph-G3. The distinguishing characteristics are:
· Glyph-G2 (this glyph) has just a central dot (for the “mo”) whereas Glyph-G3 (being related to JAN) has four radial spokes.
· Glyph-G2 (this glyph) has a NAL whereas Glyph-G3 has nothing on top.
§ Do not confuse this variant with the NAL-variant of Glyph-G9:
· Glyph-G2 (this glyph): (“old variant of HUL”) + NAL + mo.
· Glyph-G9: NAL + YIHK’IN + (optional) ITZAM.
o D. Anthropomorphic head: This variant has only one example, given in TMHW1960.pdfp432.r2.c3.
· The HUL and the main sign may or may not become detached from one another when Glyph-G is infixed in Glyph-F:
o Detaches: no known examples (try to find some).
o Doesn’t detach: PAL Temple XVII P. B4, PAL PT M17.
· Gronemeyer-GGF claims that the right top element in the variant with a stylized head (two feelers with protectors) is a variant of NAL, and the right bottom element is a variant of SIBIK, but this seems to be an attempt to impose a pattern of a maize cycle onto the Glyph-G series, not obviously applicable for Glyph-G2.