TOK.p25.r2.c4 BMM9.p15.r1.c4 = CMC4.p30.pdfp23.#4 = Safronov K&H.p30 25EMC.pdfp46.#8.3
CRN Panel 3 C2 CRN Panel 3 C2 IXZ Stela 4 B3
? “UHMAN” “UHMAN” 3.“UHMAN” BAAK.”UHMAN”? “UHMAN”
MHD.ST8.1&2 1013st 1013fc
- AK’IN
Stuart
CAY Altar 4 (top) ‘F1’ (actually E6)
<yi.ta.ji>.<2k’u.“UHMAN”>
Greene Stuart Schele Coll-1 MHD.ST8.1&2
PAL PT F8 PNG Stela 8 W3 PSD Lintel 2 A7 TIK Stela 31 D13
3.“UHMAN” IX.“UHMAN” “UHMAN”:na “UHMAN”
Graham Mathews Graham Graham Graham
YAX Lintel 1 A3 YAX Lintel 21 C7 YAX Lintel 23 D1 YAX Lintel 25 R1 YAX Lintel 26 L1
<CHAN.na>.<“UHMAN”:na> <CHAN:na>.“UHMAN” <IX.“UHMAN”>.<XOOK:ki> IX.“UHMAN” 3.“UHMAN”
Coll-1 Graham Schele (FAMSI) Schele
YAX Lintel 28 W2a YAX Lintel 59 O1 YAX Stela 11 B5 YAX Stela 12 D3
<IX:“UHMAN”> IX.<“UHMAN”:na> <CHAN.“UHMAN”> <CHAN.“UHMAN”>:na
TOK.p33.r3.c1 MHD.ZL1.1&2 1689bv
? - -
Schele Graham Graham
Dumbarton Oaks Unprovenanced Panel 2 (PAL) E1 YAX Lintel 5 A1 YAX Lintel 24 G2
3.”UHMAN” CHAN.“UHMAN” <IX:“UHMAN”:na>.<XOOK:ki>
· The TOK.p25.r2.c4 is intended to be an instance of “UHMAN”, but no pronunciation is given.
· 25EMC.pdfp46.#8.3 is mistakenly classed as a head variant of TE’, but it is “UHMAN”.
· Known to end in -n because of phonetic complement:
o Some -na (implies glottalized).
o Some -ni (implies long – i.e. glottalization started to be lost).
o Implies that the root doesn’t have -a- or -i-, but rather -e- or -u-, which is why UHMAN is now rejected.
· Former proposed reading was uhman, but that is now rejected – Dorota Bojkowska doesn’t know if the old reading was related to UH “moon”.
· The only source I’ve been able to find which gives the reading “UHMAN” is CMC4.p30.#4, with the gloss ‘ “Messenger God”? ’.
· The word appears only in names/titles (mostly in additional names/titles) – I haven’t seen it in reference to the god himself.
· AT-E1168-lecture15.t0:14:43: And at Yaxchilan, they venerated a god of sacrifice, who is like a huge bloodthirsty bird, with no lower jaw. It's generally a human face, but [with] the body of a bird, who basically is devouring the hearts of sacrificial victims, or perhaps taking them to the sky.
· LopesEtAl-OHHaHP.p78.para1.l+3: The Yaxchilan examples (Figure 2) are all confined to a rather opaque theonym, part of the long string of epithets carried by Kokaaj Bahlam “The Great”. The theonym involves the so-called “Bloody-Mouthed God” (henceforth “BMG”).
· In TIK Stela 31 D13 and MHD.ST8, the “UHMAN” has an OHL/WAAJ in the eye.
· It appears in the following names (among others):
o Ix “Uhman” Xook: an additional name of Ix K’abal Xook, one of the wives of Kokaaj Bahlam III, a ruler of YAX.
o K’uk’ “Uhman”, Yax Kokte’ Ch’ok: a carver from CAY.
o Te’ Kuy Sip, Chan “Uhman”: an additional name of Yaxuun Bahlam IV, a ruler of YAX.
o Uhx “Uhman” Chit K’uh: an additional name of Chakaw Nahb Chan, a ruler of CRN.
o Uhx “Uhman” Mat: an additional name of K’an Joy Chitam II, a ruler of PAL.
In fact, the specific combination “Uhx ‘Uhman’” occurs in the names of two different individuals, one in CRN and one in PAL.
· Proposals for pronunciation:
o AK’IN: CMHI Yax Lintel 25 R1b (mentioned by Zender as the name of the god, meaning “to clear the milpa”, 26th EMC (2021) at Bratislava with theme “Agriculture”, introductory lecture Agriculture and Aboriculture in Maya Art and Writing).
o CH’AKAN / CH’AKAHAN: Wald-PAHP.p14.para3.l+7, Wald-PAHP.p14.fn4 & Wald-PAHP.p15.fig16.
o UHMAN: CMC4.p30.#4.
Bonn tentatively accepts (approximately) the first of the above, giving a reading of AK’IIN? (long-i and a question mark).
· More recent historical background of decipherment efforts:
o Dmitri Beliaev and Albert Davletshin first proposed UHMAN.
o In some instances of the logogram, there is a bird body (e.g. 1013fc).
o Uhman is a known word for a nighthawk in Tz’eltal.
o Some instances are shown with jaguar spots.
o Early versions have what looks like a fish-fin, bird wing, human face.
o It sometimes has a tamale on the head or in the eye (though a “scroll” is more common): TIK Stela 31 D13, Throne from YAX, Collection Sotheby’s.
· In “Classic - Blocks”, MHD transliterates ST8 and ZL1 as “?? Mut” or “?? Mat”, with the “bird” (MUUT) component as a constant and integral part of the name. This is done for all instances of ST8 and ZL1) – obviously when a MUUT (MHD.BX1) is present or a syllabogram-spelling of mu (MHD.ALE) + ti (MHD.3M2) follow ST8 – but even when neither are present.
· Variants (2) – features:
o A. Head variant:
§ Simple oval forehead ornament (optional dotted or curved reinforcement on the outer side).
§ Spiral on cheek starting at the mouth or bottom of the nose.
§ No jaw to the left of the spiral, but instead a “tongue” going downwards from right to left (TIK Stela 31 D13 is one of the rare exceptions, with a jaw).
§ It is a distinguishing characteristic that the “tongue” and the “spiral” touch one another – they both descend from the upper jaw touching one another, and then diverge to the left and right respectively.
§ Optional spiral or inverted bold feeler on the top of the head.
§ Optional “mammal ear”.
o B. Boulder variant – a two-part glyph in the vertical dimension:
§ Above: CH’AK (axe).
§ Below: KAB (earth).
The equivalence of these two glyphs was first told to me by Dorota Bojkowska, who learned of it from Sergei Vepretskii.
The alternation / substitution of the head variant and the boulder variant is demonstrated in:
§ Uhx “Uhman” Mat – the childhood name of K’inich K’an Joy Chitam II.
§ Ix “Uhman” Xook – the most important of the three wives of Kokaaj Bahlam III.
§ Te’ Kuy Sip, Chan “Uhman” – part of the extended name of Yaxuun Bahlam IV.