TOK.p18.r3.c1 JM.p248.#2 MHD.1B7.1&2 0150st T150b T150c
? TZ’AM - - - -
Teufel-PhD.p375.pdfp375 Teufel-PhD.p375.pdfp375 Teufel-PhD.p375.pdfp374
PNG Stela 12 D9a PNG Stela 12 D18b PNG Stela 12 #22
“BT”.<SUUTZ’:?> “BT”.SUUTZ’ “BT”.SUUTZ’
Looper-LW.p12.pdfp25.fig1.11 Looper-LW.p12.pdfp25.fig1.11 Looper-LW.p12.pdfp25.fig1.11
QRG Stela C B9 QRG Stela C B11 QRG Stela C A13
<HIX:“BT”>.<TUUN:AJ> <CHAN:“BT”>.<TUUN:ni> <HA’:“BT”>.<TUUN:ni>
· No glyphs given in K&H, K&L, BMM9, 25EMC.
· The iconographic origin of this glyph might be bones bound together and covered in cloth, forming a “platform” for sitting on. Hence the description “bone throne”. Looper-LW refers to them as “platforms”. This distinction might be more due to Western European conceptualizations of these two words than to an actual difference in the nature of the object referred to.
· Pronunciation:
o JM.p248.#2 gives the pronunciation as TZ’AM.
o Teufel-PhD.p370&p371&p372 equates the glyphs on PNG Stela 12 to T150 and also reads them as TZ’AM.
o TOK gives the pronunciation of TOK.p12.r3.c1 & TOK.p12.r3.c2 (“cushion throne”) as TZ’AM vs. TOK.p18.r3.c1 (“bone throne”) as “?”. This suggests that these are no longer considered to be the same word and that TZ’AM is the reading of only the “cushion throne”.