CMGG entry for syllabogram tzu
(This article is part of the Learner's Maya Glyph Guide.)
|
Variant: vine
MC K&H JM TOK.p16.r3.c1 0370st
MHD.ZT1s.1
MHD.ZT1s.3
MHD.ZT1s.2
· Do not confuse with TAK = “dry”, which has K’IN in the top left, whereas tzu has LEM. · Do not confuse this with UUN / UN = “avocado”, which has a cross-hatched circle in the top left (=the seed of the avocado fruit?), whereas tzu has LEM. · It is derived from TZU(‘) meaning “gourd”. · There is also a reading as HOP for this glyph (BeliaevEtAl-NGA.p358.pdfp8, but seen only in the very limited context of the ruler name / theonym Hoplaj). MHD distinguishes them by assigning tzu the code ZT1s and HOP the code ZT1a.
Sub-variants (3) – all sub-variants are a basic vine of the gourd with infixed: · A. LEM: this is the most typical sub-variant. · B. Circle: this one could be confused with UN/UUN, but the circle in UN/UUN is typically cross hatched. · C. Two instances of the “wood” property marker: This seems to be quite an aberrant sub-variant, given by MHD.
|
Variant: ribcage
MC K&H JM MHD.ZT1s.5
· Although this resembles a spine and ribcage, it is in fact simply the codex version of the “vine” variant. · In contrast to the non-codex forms, the codex form doesn’t have an infixed circular element (the distinct shape of the vine “branches are sufficient to identify it as tzu).
|
Variant: head
MHD.SM5 0370hc
COLAIC71895 Martin-AMP.p255.fig62 mayavase.com Morley BPK-LAC - Unprovenanced Column D1 K8257 S PUS Stela E tzu.<tza:ja> tzu.<tza:ja> 5.pi.tzu <2tzu>.ja
· The examples above were found using MHD: o “blcodes contains SM5” (to get the “head with ‘tree-trunk with roots’ infixed down the middle”). o “blmaya1 does not contain tzuk” (to exclude TZUK). This gives 7 hits, of which I have selected the best 4. · Some of these contain a tree trunk (e.g. K8257 S). Such examples could be considered to be a head sub-variant of the “tree” variant, but quite a number do not have a tree-trunk. The context in which they are found shows that they are tzu. For example, in BPK-LAC Unprovenanced Column D1, the head-glyph has tza:ja very clearly after it, and the whole of D1 occurs before uhx lajuun haab. So tzutzaj uhx lajuun haab is the obvious reading. For convenience I have put all the head-related ones here, with or without a tree trunk, but the former could just as well be classed with the tree trunk variant.
|